Currently searching for posts. Please click any of the tabs below to change your search type.

Results matching your search

  • FEDNOW Digital currency aka UNIVERSAL BASIC INCOME…with conditions …More job cuts:
    * Con 1. Universal Basic Income (UBI) takes money from the poor and gives it to everyone, increasing poverty and depriving the poor of much needed targeted support. ...
    * Con 2. UBI is too expensive. ...
    * Con 3. UBI removes the incentive to work, adversely affecting the economy and leading to a labor and skills shortage.
    https://www.procon.org › headlineshttps://www.procon.org/headlines/universal-basic-income-top-3-pros-and-cons/Why is UBI ineffective?
    The obvious objection to giving everyone a livable income, whether or not they work, is that many will stop working. Production could then fall so much that the population will be reduced to poverty. Indeed, even the UBI itself could collapse because **the Government will be unable to collect enough tax to fund it**.Jun 13, 2023
    https://iea.org.uk › universal-basic-i...https://iea.org.uk/universal-basic-income-a-pointless-trial-of-a-bad-idea/#:~:text=The%20obvious%20objection%20to%20giving,enough%20tax%20to%20fund%20it.concerns about its cost, work incentives, inflationary pressure, and long-term sustainability should be carefully considered.Jun 28, 2023
    https://medium.com › the-pros-and-...https://medium.com/@KnowExpose/the-pros-and-cons-of-universal-basic-income-ubi-2b9ca9fa37e1#:~:text=Universal%20Basic%20Income%20is%20a,sustainability%20should%20be%20carefully%20considered.Is UBI affect the rich?
    In that situation, the benefit of giving everyone (rather than just lower-income people) a basic income goes down. **The wealthy would realize they effectively get nothing from UBI, and there would be additional bureaucracy, which might even end up costing more**.
    And resources have been cut to Euro countries cost will jump exponentially in a short period of time. This is called a RECESSION.
    FEDNOW Digital currency aka UNIVERSAL BASIC INCOME…with conditions …More job cuts: * Con 1. Universal Basic Income (UBI) takes money from the poor and gives it to everyone, increasing poverty and depriving the poor of much needed targeted support. ... * Con 2. UBI is too expensive. ... * Con 3. UBI removes the incentive to work, adversely affecting the economy and leading to a labor and skills shortage. https://www.procon.org › headlineshttps://www.procon.org/headlines/universal-basic-income-top-3-pros-and-cons/Why is UBI ineffective? The obvious objection to giving everyone a livable income, whether or not they work, is that many will stop working. Production could then fall so much that the population will be reduced to poverty. Indeed, even the UBI itself could collapse because **the Government will be unable to collect enough tax to fund it**.Jun 13, 2023 https://iea.org.uk › universal-basic-i...https://iea.org.uk/universal-basic-income-a-pointless-trial-of-a-bad-idea/#:~:text=The%20obvious%20objection%20to%20giving,enough%20tax%20to%20fund%20it.concerns about its cost, work incentives, inflationary pressure, and long-term sustainability should be carefully considered.Jun 28, 2023 https://medium.com › the-pros-and-...https://medium.com/@KnowExpose/the-pros-and-cons-of-universal-basic-income-ubi-2b9ca9fa37e1#:~:text=Universal%20Basic%20Income%20is%20a,sustainability%20should%20be%20carefully%20considered.Is UBI affect the rich? In that situation, the benefit of giving everyone (rather than just lower-income people) a basic income goes down. **The wealthy would realize they effectively get nothing from UBI, and there would be additional bureaucracy, which might even end up costing more**. And resources have been cut to Euro countries cost will jump exponentially in a short period of time. This is called a RECESSION.
    WWW.PROCON.ORG
    ProCon.org - Pros and Cons of 100+ Topics
    Explore both sides of debated issues. Presented in a non-partisan format with supporting background information, statistics, and resources.
    0 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 2K Views 0 previzualizare
  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) whistleblower made bombshell claims against the U.S. intelligence agency on Tuesday relating to the origins of COVID-19.

    The Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic and Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence announced that members heard testimony from a CIA whistleblower who alleged that the CIA "offered six analysts significant monetary incentives to change their position on COVID-19's origin."
    Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) whistleblower made bombshell claims against the U.S. intelligence agency on Tuesday relating to the origins of COVID-19. The Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic and Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence announced that members heard testimony from a CIA whistleblower who alleged that the CIA "offered six analysts significant monetary incentives to change their position on COVID-19's origin."
    0 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 124 Views 0 previzualizare
  • CONT’D: “..it wasn’t long before infant and child mortality rates rose to levels not seen since the 1970s.
    Technology hackers were also hard at work. Internet scams and pyramid schemes plagued inboxes. Meanwhile, more sophisticated hackers attempted to take down corporations,
    government systems, and banks via phishing scams and database information heists, and their many successes generated billions of dollars in losses. Desperate to protect themselves and their intellectual property, the few multinationals“
    still thriving enacted strong, increasingly complex defensive measures. Patent applications skyrocketed and patent thickets proliferated,
    as companies fought to claim and control even the tiniest innovations. Security measures and screenings tightened.
    This “wild west” environment had a profound impact on innovation. The threat of being hacked and the presence of so many thefts and fakes lowered the incentives to create “me first” rather than “me too” technologies. And so many patent thickets made the cross-pollination of ideas and research difficult at best. Blockbuster pharmaceuticals quickly became artifacts of
    the past, replaced by increased production
    of generics. Breakthrough innovations still happened in various industries, but they were focused more on technologies that could not be easily replicated or re-engineered.
    CONT’D: “..it wasn’t long before infant and child mortality rates rose to levels not seen since the 1970s. Technology hackers were also hard at work. Internet scams and pyramid schemes plagued inboxes. Meanwhile, more sophisticated hackers attempted to take down corporations, government systems, and banks via phishing scams and database information heists, and their many successes generated billions of dollars in losses. Desperate to protect themselves and their intellectual property, the few multinationals“ still thriving enacted strong, increasingly complex defensive measures. Patent applications skyrocketed and patent thickets proliferated, as companies fought to claim and control even the tiniest innovations. Security measures and screenings tightened. This “wild west” environment had a profound impact on innovation. The threat of being hacked and the presence of so many thefts and fakes lowered the incentives to create “me first” rather than “me too” technologies. And so many patent thickets made the cross-pollination of ideas and research difficult at best. Blockbuster pharmaceuticals quickly became artifacts of the past, replaced by increased production of generics. Breakthrough innovations still happened in various industries, but they were focused more on technologies that could not be easily replicated or re-engineered.
    0 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 189 Views 0 previzualizare